Chigwell 9:28 Wed Feb 24
Modernising WHO for the OS
|
|
WHO is an entertaining fans' forum, far more interesting and wide-ranging than several others I have seen. It seems as popular when the team is playing crappily in the Championship as on the rare occasions (such as now) when we look like we might beat anyone in the Prem.
The move to the OS should result in an influx of new supporters: at least that is the expectation at the Club. Increasingly women are attending football matches, and we can hope for a greater female following, which should lead in turn to a future of properly-indoctrinated children as lifelong Hammers.
The vast majority of WHO users are male, and that is likely to continue, but if WHO wants to remain no.1 forum when we move, it needs to think about what might attract/deter women from its use. The persistent use of "cunt" can be amusing but often boring, and will immediately dissuade most women from using the site.
I am the last person to favour political correctness, but how about making that change at least, mods?
|
|
|
Replies - Newest Posts First ( Show In Chronological Order)
Brain Damaged
11:58 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Whatever happened to Dirty Gurty?
|
Brain Damaged
11:56 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Is his recent moderator status the reason why Jeff doesn't WHOmail me any more?
|
Dan M
11:56 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Are there any other ladies who regularly post other than Nurse, Debs and ChesterRd?
|
Alan
11:49 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
North Bank 8:08 Wed Feb 24
"we're looking to shake things up on WHO and make it even more anarchic by appointing Erith Jeff a Mod"
Shirley, he already is a mod.
|
Coffee
10:43 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
ironsofcanada 10:51 Wed Feb 24
"Does KUMB have a larger female component?"
Do you mean does it have a load of massive tits? If so, yes.
|
1985
10:40 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
If the OS can have retractable seats then surely WHO can have CLICKABLE LINKS
|
madeeasy
8:39 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
100 reasons not to change
|
Scraper
8:37 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Are there loads of chicks over at kumb then?
Not my impression
Many unkissed men though
|
kylay
3:22 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
look, I'm not one to complain but you all are the cuntiest bunch of cunts who ever cunted, and I'll not be cunted off for enjoying a good cunting.
HairyHammer 6:12 Wed Feb 24
better yet any ladies looking to join should be required to show a little pink.
This is actually one of the better moderated forums on the interwebs. The fact that it hardly ever changes from a format standpoint is one of the things I like about it. simple fucking text is all that's needed. The people and the fans make the place not the other way around, so keep up the good work Leonard and friends.
|
Saul Bollox
2:03 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Bring back black font posters
|
normannomates
1:44 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
KUMB is moderated by a bunch of tossers..who take it far to seriously..I think I lasted half a day.
|
stomper
1:16 Thu Feb 25
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Women going to football matches, apart from desperate girlfriends?
It'll never happen
|
ILOVEPAOLODICANIO
10:58 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
North Bank 8:08 Wed Feb 24
How about Texas Iron as a mod as well?
|
ironsofcanada
10:51 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Does KUMB have a larger female component? Honest question for those that do both.
|
ILOVEPAOLODICANIO
10:48 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
You deserve to be glassed for this post.
|
Sniper
10:44 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Shut it Bufflechops
|
North Bank
8:08 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
VirginiaHam we're looking to shake things up on WHO and make it even more anarchic by appointing Erith Jeff a Mod
|
chad sexington
8:06 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
If you want that shit then fuck off to the humour graveyard that is Kumb
|
VirginiaHam
6:15 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
I like the fact you can use any word here as long as it doesn't have racial overtones. I also like that threads disappear wildly off topic and no-one does anything about it.
Probably as amusing as anything is the way threads degenerate into outright slangng matches and abuse.
KUMB is bland and over moderated.
|
HairyHammer
6:12 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
Normally I do not swear but on here i become a bit of a C word to be fare and use it far too much, it is pathetic and should not be used yes we are men but most of us I guess do have family's no ?.
Oh and Who should have some pink in it to attract the ladies Claret and Blue is nice but a bit of pink may do the trick.
|
Johnson
6:05 Wed Feb 24
Re: Modernising WHO for the OS
|
I see comma did the off when challenged. Absolute shocker that.
|
| 
